ⓘ Free online encyclopedia. Did you know? page 267



                                               

Baggett v. Bullitt

Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or ...

                                               

Baldwin v. Fish & Game Commission of Montana

Baldwin v. Fish & Game Commission of Montana, 436 U.S. 371, was a United States Supreme Court case that affirmed the right of the state of Montana to charge higher fees for out-of-state elk hunters.

                                               

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Assn v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership

Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, 526 U.S. 434, was a decision by the United States Supreme Court.

                                               

Banks v. Manchester

Banks v. Manchester, 128 U.S. 244, was a United States Supreme Court ruling dealing with copyright. In 1882, to facilitate the printing of records of the Supreme Court of Ohio, the state of Ohio passed a resolution to establish a copyright held b ...

                                               

Barber v. Thomas

Barber v. Thomas, 560 U.S. 474, was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. It concerned how the United States Federal Bureau of Prisons should calculate "good time credits", reduced sentences for inmates who stayed out of troub ...

                                               

Bartkus v. Illinois

Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121, is a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision held that coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the double jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ...

                                               

Bartlett v. Strickland

Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1, is a United States Supreme Court case in which a plurality of the Court held that a minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before section 2 of the Voting Rig ...

                                               

Bates v. City of Little Rock

Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government to compel the disclosure of an organizations membership lists v ...

                                               

Baxstrom v. Herold

Baxstrom v. Herold, 383 U.S. 107, was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that civil commitment following a prison term does not run afoul of double jeopardy principles.

                                               

Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover

Beacon Theatres v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500, was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with jury trials in civil matters. The court held that where legal and equitable claims are joined in the same action, the legal claim ...

                                               

Beard v. United States

Beard v. United States, 158 U.S. 550, is a United States Supreme Court case in which self-defense in a homicide case was found not to require a duty to retreat.

                                               

Bicknell v. Comstock

Bicknell v. Comstock, 113 U.S. 149, was an action to recover the cost paid for a tract of land in Iowa and the value of the improvements made by the defendant. The complaint alleged a conveyance by Bicknell to one Bennett, the subsequent transfer ...

                                               

Blair v. Miller

Blair v. Miller was a U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1800, without oral argument, in which the court held that a writ of error is a nullity if not returned till the term next succeeding that to which it was returnable. A judgment was rendered ...

                                               

Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores

Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores, 421 U.S. 723, was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that only those suffering direct loss from the purchase or sale of stock had standing to sue under federal securities law. The Cou ...

                                               

Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen

Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1, is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld the Grain Futures Act as constitutional under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

                                               

Board of Trustees of State University of New York v. Fox

Board of Trustees of State University of New York v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instructed a lower court to reevaluate the compatibility of a resolution of the State University of New York that pro ...

                                               

Bolles v. Outing Co.

Bolles v. Outing Co., 175 U.S. 262, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held under the Revised Statutes of the United States, someone seeking damages for copyright infringement is only eligible for damages from illicit copie ...

                                               

Bong v. Campbell Art Co.

Bong v. Campbell Art Co., 214 U.S. 236, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, under the International Copyright Act of 1891, A copyright cannot be granted to a non-citizen whose country has not been acknowledged as in a ...

                                               

Boyd v. United States

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, in which the Court held that" a search and seizure a compulsory production of a mans private papers” and that the search was" an unreasonable search and seizu ...

                                               

Braden v. United States

Braden v. United States, 365 U.S. 431, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the conviction of the petitioner, Carl Braden, based on his refusal to answer questions posed to him by the House Un-American Activities C ...

                                               

Brady v. Daly

Brady v. Daly, 175 U.S. 148, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the common law circuit court did have jurisdiction over the copyright infringement case because the statutory damages were not a penalty or forfeiture. Th ...

                                               

The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.

The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Company, 407 U.S. 1, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered when a U.S. court should uphold the validity of a contractual forum selection clause. The parties had entered into an agreeme ...

                                               

Briscoe v. LaHue

Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 did not authorize a convicted state defendant to assert a claim for damages against a police officer for giving perjured te ...

                                               

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, Inc.

Broadcast Music v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 441 U.S. 1, was an important antitrust case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.

                                               

Broadrick v. Oklahoma

Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, is a United States Supreme Court decision upholding an Oklahoma statute which prohibited state employees from engaging in partisan political activities. Broadrick is often cited to enunciate the test for a fac ...

                                               

Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.

Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc., 472 U.S. 491, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that though portions of a law against obscenity and prostitution might be invalid, it would not be invalidated as a whole unless seve ...

                                               

Brown v. New Jersey

Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.S. 172, is a United States Supreme Court case which held that the use of a struck jury did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment.

                                               

Brown v. Van Braam

Brown v. Van Braam, 3 U.S. 344, was a United States Supreme Court case holding that: "Under the practice of the courts of Rhode Island, as adopted by the judiciary act, the entry of a default, after a plea of the general issue, no similar being o ...

                                               

Bruton v. United States

Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, is a 1968 United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court held that a defendant was deprived of his rights under the Confrontation Clause if a confession by his codefendant was introduced in their join ...

                                               

Buck v. Gallagher

Buck v. Gallagher, 307 U.S. 95, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court had two main holdings. First, ASCAP members have a common and undivided interest in the right to license in association through the Society free of the stat ...

                                               

Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank

Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, 575 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that an order from a bankruptcy court denying a debtors confirmation of a proposed repayment cannot be immediately appealed, as it is not a f ...

                                               

Bullcoming v. New Mexico

Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647, is a significant 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause case decided by the United States Supreme Court. On June 23, 2011, the Supreme Court considered the issue whether a defendants Confrontation Clause rights ...

                                               

Bumper v. North Carolina

Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which a search was struck down as illegal because the police falsely claimed they had a search warrant. This was tantamount to telling the subject that she had no choice but ...

                                               

Burch v. Louisiana

Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130, was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that invalidated a Louisiana statute allowing a conviction upon a nonunanimous verdict from a jury of six for a petty offense. The statute allowed for convict ...

                                               

Burgess v. United States

Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124, was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the interpretation of the words "federal drug offense" in the Controlled Substances Act.

                                               

Burns v. Reed

Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, was a United States Supreme Court case. A prosecutor was absolutely immune from damages based upon positions taken in a probable cause hearing for a search warrant. The same prosecutor was not held entitled to immunit ...

                                               

Cabell v. Chavez-Salido

Cabell v. Chavez-Salido, 454 U.S. 432, was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld a state law as constitutional that excluded aliens from positions as probation officers. The Court found that probation officers fell ...

                                               

Califano v. Yamasaki

Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided an issue of Federal statutory hearing rights. Under section 204a1 of the Social Security Act, the Secretary of the Department of Health, Educati ...

                                               

California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz

California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz, 416 U.S. 21, was a US Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Bank Secrecy Act, passed by Congress in 1970 requiring banks to record all transactions and report certain domestic and foreign transact ...

                                               

California v. Acevedo

California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565, was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the c ...

                                               

Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.

Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co., 215 U.S. 182, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held a person cannot file a second copyright claim to amend the first, even if the first was determined to be invalid.

                                               

Callaghan v. Myers

Callaghan v. Myers, 128 U.S. 617, was a United States Supreme Court ruling dealing with copyright. The firm of Eugene B. Myers & Chandler, composed of Myers and Horace P. Chandler, purchased the copyright of the arrangement of a number of Illinoi ...

                                               

Camreta v. Greene

Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the general case the Court may review a lower courts constitutional ruling at the behest of government officials who have won final judgment ...

                                               

Cannon v. United States

Cannon v. United States, 116 U.S. 55, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held compacts for sexual non-intercourse, easily made and easily broken, when the prior marriage relations continue to exist, with the occupation of t ...

                                               

Capron v. Van Noorden

Capron v. Van Noorden, 6 U.S. 126, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court allowed a plaintiff to dismiss a case that he had lost at trial because of a lack of diversity jurisdiction, leaving the plaintiff free to bring the case ...

                                               

Champion v. Ames

Champion v. Ames, 188 U.S. 321, was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that trafficking lottery tickets constituted interstate commerce that could be regulated by the U.S. Congress under the Commerce Clause.

                                               

Chandler v. Florida

Chandler v. Florida, 449 U.S. 560, was a legal case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state could allow the broadcast and still photography coverage of criminal trials. While refraining from formally overruling Estes v. ...

                                               

Chiarella v. United States

Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222, is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an employee of a printer handling corporate takeover bids who deduced target companies identities and dealt in their stock without discl ...

                                               

Chicago Police Dept. v. Mosley

Chicago Police Dept. v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, was a United States Supreme Court case. In an opinion by Justice Marshall, the Court ruled that the Chicagos ordinance prohibiting non-labor pickets on school property violated the First Amendments Fre ...

                                               

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that procedural due process limits state regulatory power over railroad rates. A regulatory agency in Minnes ...

Encyclopedic dictionary

Translation
Free and no ads
no need to download or install

Pino - logical board game which is based on tactics and strategy. In general this is a remix of chess, checkers and corners. The game develops imagination, concentration, teaches how to solve tasks, plan their own actions and of course to think logically. It does not matter how much pieces you have, the main thing is how they are placement!

online intellectual game →