ⓘ Free online encyclopedia. Did you know? page 269



                                               

McDonnell v. United States

McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the appeal of former Virginia Governor Robert F. McDonnells conviction under the Hobbs Act. At issue on appeal was whether the definition of "official act ...

                                               

McGautha v. California

McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183, is a criminal case heard by the United States Supreme Court, in which the Court held that the lack of legal standards by which juries imposed the death penalty was not an unconstitutional violation of the due ...

                                               

McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Co.

McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Co., 191 U.S. 267, was a United States Supreme Court ruling dealing with copyright. It dealt with the interpretation of Section 4963 of the Revised Statutes of the United States before and after the pertinent sec ...

                                               

McNeill v. United States

McNeill v. United States, 563 U.S. 816, was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that, regarding whether an offense under State law is a serious drug offense for purposes of federal sentencing, courts must consult the maxi ...

                                               

Memoirs v. Massachusetts

Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, was the United States Supreme Court decision that attempted to clarify a holding regarding obscenity made a decade earlier in Roth v. United States. Since the Roth ruling, to be declared obscene a work of l ...

                                               

Merrell v. Tice

Merrell v. Tice, 104 U.S. 557, was a United States Supreme Court ruling dealing with copyright. At the time, a prerequisite for having a copyright was delivering two copies of the material to the Library of Congress within a time limit. Tice sued ...

                                               

Meyer v. Holley

Meyer v. Holley, 537 U.S. 280, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fair Housing Act imposes strict liability on residential real estate corporations for racial discrimination, but the officers and owners of th ...

                                               

Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo

Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241, was a United States Supreme Court case that overturned a Florida state law requiring newspapers to allow equal space in their newspapers to political candidates in the case of a political edi ...

                                               

Michigan v. Mosley

Michigan v. Moseley, 423 U.S. 96, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a criminal suspects assertion of his right to remain silent after a Miranda warning does not preclude the police from re-Mirandizing him and que ...

                                               

Mifflin v. Dutton

Mifflin v. Dutton, 190 U.S. 265, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the authorized appearance of a work in a magazine without a copyright notice specifically dedicated to that work transfers that work into the pub ...

                                               

Mifflin v. R. H. White Company

Mifflin v. R. H. White Company, 190 U.S. 260, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the authorized appearance of a work in a magazine without a copyright notice specifically dedicated to that work transfers that work ...

                                               

Millbrook v. United States

Millbrook v. United States, 569 U.S. 50, is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that holds that the Federal Tort Claims Act waives the sovereign immunity of the United States for certain intentional torts committed by law enforce ...

                                               

Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.

Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc., 362 U.S. 373, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the executor of a copyright holders will is eligible to renew that copyright.

                                               

Miller v. Albright

Miller v. Albright, 523 U.S. 420, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of laws relating to U.S. citizenship at birth for children born outside the United States, out of wedlock, to an American parent. The ...

                                               

Milliken v. Meyer

Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, was a U.S. legal case in which both parties were residents of Wyoming. However, the defendant, Meyer, at the time of the suit was served personally in Colorado. In the subsequent trial he collaterally challenged t ...

                                               

Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder

Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder, 469 U.S. 153, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that if the author of a work authorizes derivatives, the terms negotiated in exchange for that grant stand even if the grant is later rescin ...

                                               

Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Commissioner

Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner, 460 U.S. 575, was an opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States overturning a use tax on paper and ink in excess of 0.000 consumed in any calendar year. The Minneapolis Star Tribune initial ...

                                               

Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.

Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp., 571 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined whether a class-action suit was properly removed to federal district court as a mass action under the Class Action ...

                                               

Mitchell v. Wisconsin

Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 588 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "when a driver is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test, the exigent-circumstances doctrine generally permits a blood test without a ...

                                               

Morton v. Ruiz

Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court. Ramon Ruiz and his wife Anita were Papago Indians and U.S. citizens who in 1940 left the Papago reservation in Arizona to seek employment 15 miles away at the ...

                                               

Murphy v. Waterfront Commission

Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, 378 U.S. 52, was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the self-incrimination clause in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that a state cannot compel ...

                                               

National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co.

National Mutual Insurance Company v. Tidewater Transfer Company, 337 U.S. 582, was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. §1332. §1332 treats citizens of United States territories as citizens of a state ...

                                               

Nebraska v. Parker

Nebraska v. Parker, 577 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Congresss 1882 Act did not diminish the Omaha Indian Reservation. The disputed land is within the reservations boundaries.

                                               

Nevada v. Hicks

Nevada v. Hicks, 533 U.S. 353, is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the jurisdiction of Tribal Courts when state officials are sued by tribal members in tribal court. The Supreme Court unanimously decided that Tribal courts lack jurisd ...

                                               

New Hampshire v. Maine

New Hampshire v. Maine, 426 U.S. 363, was an original jurisdiction case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the boundary between the states of New Hampshire and Maine was fixed by the 1740 decree of King George II of Great B ...

                                               

Ng Fung Ho v. White

Ng Fung Ho v. White, 259 U.S. 276, is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that habeas corpus petitioners are entitled to a de novo judicial hearing to adjudicate claims that they are citizens of the United States.

                                               

Nichols v. United States

Nichols v. United States, 578 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act does not require an individual to update his registration after departing a state.

                                               

Niemotko v. Maryland

Niemotko v. Maryland, 340 U.S. 268, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the city of Havre de Grace, Maryland had violated the free exercise of Niemotkos religion by not issuing a permit for him and his religious g ...

                                               

Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC

Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC, 528 U.S. 377, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that their earlier decision in Buckley v. Valeo, upholding federal limits on campaign contributions also applied to state limit ...

                                               

Norris v. Alabama

Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587, was one of the cases decided by the United States Supreme Court that arose out of the trial of the Scottsboro Boys. This was a case in which nine African-American teenagers were accused of raping two white women i ...

                                               

Ohio v. Clark

Ohio v. Clark, 576 U.S. ___, is United States Supreme Court case opinion that narrowed the standard set in Crawford v. Washington for determining whether hearsay statements in criminal cases are permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Six ...

                                               

One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania

One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania, 380 U.S. 693, was a Supreme Court of the United States case handed down in 1965. The Court ruled that civil forfeiture could not apply where the evidence used to invoke the forfeiture was obtained illegall ...

                                               

Order of St. Benedict of New Jersey v. Steinhauser

Order of St. Benedict of New Jersey v. Steinhauser, 234 U.S. 640, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when someone joins an ecclesiastical order, subject to individual state law, their income from copyright may be ...

                                               

Oregon v. Kennedy

Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, was a United States Supreme Court decision dealing with the appropriate test for determining whether a criminal defendant has been "goaded" by the prosecutions bad actions into motioning for a mistrial. This matte ...

                                               

Paige v. Banks

Paige v. Banks, 80 U.S. 608, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held an agreement that transfers a copyright from the original author to a second party for perpetuity does not end with the statutory limit of copyright at th ...

                                               

Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton

Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a state courts injunction against the showing of obscene films in a movie theatre restricted to consenting adults. The Court distinguished the case fr ...

                                               

Parisi v. Davidson

Parisi v. Davidson, 405 U.S. 34, was a United States Supreme Court case resulting in the grant of habeas corpus relief to a soldier, Joseph Parisi, seeking an honorable discharge as a conscientious objector. The case was argued on October 19 and ...

                                               

Parker v. North Carolina

Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a plea agreement was valid even if the defendant entered into it in order to avoid the death penalty and even if his decision was based o ...

                                               

Paroline v. United States

Paroline v. United States, 572 U.S. ___, is a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that to recover restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2259, the government or the victim must establish a causal relationship between the defendants conduct ...

                                               

Payton v. New York

Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, was a United States Supreme Court case concerning warrantless entry into a private home in order to make a felony arrest. The Court struck down a New York statute providing for such warrantless entries because th ...

                                               

Pegram v. Herdrich

Pegram v. Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211, was a United States Supreme Court case that held that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 does not provide a remedy for coverage determinations by health maintenance organizations. The case is imp ...

                                               

Pennsylvania v. Finley

                                               

Pennsylvania v. New York

Pennsylvania v. New York, was a case which were heard in 1972 before the U.S. Supreme Court. The initial filing was allowed at 407 U.S. 206 and the final decision was ordered at 407 U.S. 223. When two states have a controversy between each other, ...

                                               

Pepper v. United States

Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476, is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States concerning whether a United States District Court properly handled the sentencing of a former methamphetamine dealer. He was originally sentenced to 24 ...

                                               

Perez v. Campbell

Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Arizonas law suspending a drivers license was unconstitutional due to its conflict with the federal Bankruptcy Act under the Supremacy Clause of ...

                                               

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, 575 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the D.C. Circuits Paralyzed Veterans doctrine is contrary to a clear reading of the Administrative Procedure Act and "imprope ...

                                               

Perpich v. Department of Defense

Perpich v. Department of Defense, 496 U.S. 334, was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court concerning the Militia Clauses of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution in which the court held that Congress may authorize me ...

                                               

Perris v. Hexamer

Perris v. Hexamer, 99 U.S. 674, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held a map-maker has no more an exclusive right to use the form of the characters they employ to express their ideas on a map than they have to use the type ...

                                               

Perry v. New Hampshire

The plaintiff, Barion Perry was convicted for breaking into a car in 2008. A witness, Nubia Blandon told the police that she observed Perry committing the crime from her apartment window. Although she identified him at the scene of the crime, she ...

                                               

Pettibone v. United States

Pettibone v. United States, 148 U.S. 197, is a United States Supreme Court criminal case involving the knowledge requirement in an obstruction of justice case. It was the first Supreme Court case involving interpretation of obstruction of justice ...

Encyclopedic dictionary

Translation
Free and no ads
no need to download or install

Pino - logical board game which is based on tactics and strategy. In general this is a remix of chess, checkers and corners. The game develops imagination, concentration, teaches how to solve tasks, plan their own actions and of course to think logically. It does not matter how much pieces you have, the main thing is how they are placement!

online intellectual game →